Avoiding Catch-22: validating the PainDETECT in a in a population of patients with chronic pain

H. Timmerman, A. Wolff, E. Bronkhorst, O. Wilder-Smith, M. Schenkels, N. van Dasselaar, F. Huygen, M. Steegers and K. Vissers

BMC Neurol 2018;18(1):91.

DOI PMID Cited by ~16

Neuropathic pain is defined as pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system and is a major therapeutic challenge. Several screening tools have been developed to help physicians detect patients with neuropathic pain. These have typically been validated in populations pre-stratified for neuropathic pain, leading to a so called "Catch-22 situation:" "a problematic situation for which the only solution is denied by a circumstance inherent in the problem or by a rule". The validity of screening tools needs to be proven in patients with pain who were not pre-stratified on basis of the target outcome: neuropathic pain or non-neuropathic pain. This study aims to assess the validity of the Dutch PainDETECT (PainDETECT A cross-sectional multicentre design was used to assess PainDETECT In total, 291 patients were included. Primary analysis was done on patients where both physicians agreed upon the pain classification (n = 228). Compared to the physician's classification, PainDETECT Despite its internal consistency and test-retest reliability the PainDETECT The protocol was registered prospectively in the Dutch National Trial Register: NTR 3030 .